THE NOTION OF IDIOSTYLE IN LINGUISTIC STUDIES OF LITERARY TEXTS

Автор(и)

  • Iryna Sydorenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2617-5339.2018.1.148751

Ключові слова:

literary text, author’s idiostyle, lingvostylistic research, scientific approach, author's speech model

Анотація

The article highlights peculiarities of the author’s individual style investigation as a part of literary text stylistics. Main attention is given to the approaches to individual style study and its place in linguistic researches of literary texts. The research aim is obtained with the help of scientific methods: generalization, conceptualization and comparison of the directions of idiostyle study in order to define the most appropriate approach for outlining the idiostylistic peculiarities of the literary texts authors. The analysis of early and current publications exploring the idiostylistic peculiarities of the author’s speech is presented. Ten basic tendencies in idiostyle investigation are separated, analyzed and compared. The conducted exploring provides the possibility to reveal that studying the language of literary texts through the prism of the author's speech analysis is one of the most relevant tasks of modern linguistics. A comparative analysis indicates that one of the most common areas of its study today is the analysis of the author's conceptual sphere in combination with the study of stylistic techniques, syntax and individual vocabulary. The combination of several approaches within a single study makes it possible to describe the peculiarities of idiostyle of a literary text writer and provide a complete understanding of the selection and synthesis principles of linguistic means by a certain author, reveal the prevailing features and outline a prototype of the individual speech model. The prospect of research is considered in defining the approaches to the author’s idiostyle study in dramatic genre.

Посилання

Babych, V. I. (2017). Movnostylistychni zasoby vyrazhennja lirychnogho Ja na leksyko-ghramatychnomu rivni poetychnogho tekstu (na materiali idiodyskursiv R. Frosta j K. Sendbergha) [Linguo-stylistic means of expression of lyrical i at lexical and grammatival level of a poetic text (based on idiodiscourses of R. Frost and C. Sandberg)]. Naukovyj visnyk Khersonsjkogho derzhavnogho universytetu, 3, 109-116.

Bahtin, M. M. (1986). Jestetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of the wordy creation]. Moscow, Russia: Iskusstvo.

Bezrebra, N. Ju. (2007). Linhvostylistychnyi ta Semantyko-Kohnityvnyi Aspekty Poetyky E. Dikinson [Linguostylistic and semantic-cognitive aspects of E. Dikinson poetics]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Bolotnova, N. S. (2009). Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: slovar-tezaurus [Communicative Stylistics of the Text]. Moscow, Russia: Flinta, Nauka.

Domylivsjka, L. V. (2011) Idiostyl' Yuriia Yanovskoho v konteksti linhvoestetychnykh paradyhm pershoi polovyny XX st. [The Yurii Yanovskii’s Individual Style through the System of Language and Aesthetic Paradyghms at the Beginning of the 20th Century]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Fateeva, N. A. (2000). Kontrapunkt intertekstual'nosti, ili Intertekst v mire tekstov [Contrapoint of intertextuality or Intertext in the world of texts]. Moscow, Russia: Agar.

Fomenko, Je. G. (2006). Lingvotipologicheskoye v idiostile Dzheymsa Dzhoysa [Linguo-Typological Properties of James Joyce’s Idiostyle]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Zaporozhye, Ukraine.

Gryshchenko, Ja. S. (2013). Dy`skursy`vnist` virshovany`x tvoriv: kognity`vno-pragmaty`chny`j vy`mir (na materiali anglijs`koyi ta amery`kans`koyi poeziyi XVII – XX stolit`) [Cognitive and Pragmatic Aspect of Poetry Discursiveness in English and American Verses of the 17th – 20th Centuries]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Jermolenko, S. Ja. (1982). Syntaksys i stylistychna semantyka [Syntax and stylistic semantics]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Naukova dumka.

Kalinina, Ju. M. (2009). Kompozicija hudozhestvennogo teksta kak sredstvo vyrazhenija ego antropocentrichnosti [Literary text composition as a mean of its anthropocentricism expression]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Lipeck, Russia.

Klovak, E. V. (2015). Tipichnye avtorskie modeli kak realizacija universal’nogo i individual’nogo v idiostile [Typical author’s models as realization of general and individual in idiostyle]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Tver’, Russia.

Kotkova, L. I. (2017). Idiolekt Volodymyra Vynnychenka: leksyko-frazeologhichni ta stylistychni skladnyky [Volodymyr Vynnychenko idiolect: lexic-phraseological and stylistic components]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Nizhyn, Ukraine.

Kotova, A. G. (2000). Pragmasemanticheskie aspekty idiostilja N. S. Gumileva :Na materiale pojeticheskih proizvedenij [Pragmasemantic aspects of Gumilev idiostyle : on the material of poetry]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Volgograd, Russia.

Kukharenko, V. A. (2004). Interpritacija teksta [The text interpretation]. Vinnycja, Ukraine: Nova Knyga.

Langacker, Ronald W. (1991). Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110857733

Larin, B. A. (1974). Jestetika slova i jazyk pisatelja [Aesthetics of speech and language writer]. Moscow, Russia: Fiction.

Ledeneva, V. V. (2001). Idiostil' (k utochneniyu ponyatiya) [Idiostyle (to Clarify the Concept)]. Filologicheskiye nauki, 5, 36–41.

Makar, I. S. (2010). Leksy`chna idiosy`stema romanu Longa Dafnis i Xloya [Lexical Idiosystem of Longus's Novel “Daphnis and Chloe”]. PhD dissertation, Lviv, Ukraine.

Mazepova, O. V. (2007). Lighvistychni osoblyvosti idiostylju Sokhraba Sepekhri [Linguistic peculiarities of Sokhrab Sepekhri idiostyle]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Narrog, H. (2012). Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001

Novikov, L. A. (1988). Hudozhestvennyj tekst i ego analiz [Literary text and its analysis]. Moscow, Russia: Russkij jazyk.

Olifirenko, L. V. (2002). Movna estetyka poeziji Vasylja Stusa [Language aesthetics of Vasyl Stus poetry]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Donetsk, Ukraine.

Palijchuk, A. L. (2011). Naratyvnyj kod intymizaciji [Narrative code of intimization]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Samohina, V. A. (2008). Sovremennaja anglojazychnaja shutka [Modern English joke]. Har’kov, Ukraine: HNU.

Sokolovsjka, S. F. (2013). Obraz avtora u khudozhnjomu tvori [The Author's Image in a Piece of Fiction]. Zhytomyr, Ukraine: Visnyk Zhytomyrsjkogho derzhavnogho universytetu, 5 (71), 222-226.

Solganik, G. Ja. (2009). Stilistika texta [Text stylistics]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.

Strokalj, O. M. (2011). Indy`vidual`no-avtors`ke slovo v sy`stemi xudozhn`ogo idiosty`lyu (na materiali poety`chny`x tvoriv V. Kolomijcya ta P. Movchana) [Strokal A. N. Individual-author’s word in system of idiastyle art (on a material of Vladimir Kolomiet’s and Pavlo Movchan’s poetic texts)]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Tarasova, I. A. (2012). Poeticheskiy idiostil' v kognitivnom aspekte [Poetic idiostyle in Cognitive Aspect]. Moscow, Russia: FLINTA.

Vinogradov, V. V. (1971). O teorii khudozhestvennoy rechi [On the Theory of Artistic Speech]. Moskow, Russia: Vysshaya shkola.

Yurina, Yu. M. (2016). Idiostylj Oleny Telighy [Olena Teliga idiostyle]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Kherson, Ukraine.

##submission.downloads##

Номер

Розділ

Статті